Liz Wager: Does the Wakefield et al case mean we should demand public access to raw data?

The latest chapter in the sad saga of the Wakefield et al paper on the MMR vaccine raises some difficult questions about access to individual patient data. It is possible that the apparent discrepancies between the patient records and the publication might have come to light a whole lot sooner, perhaps even before publication, if […]

Read More…

Elizabeth Loder on making publication ethics matter to authors

These are heady times for the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Its membership has broadened considerably in recent years. It now boasts over 6000 member journals and is no longer mainly biomedical.  The attendance roster for the second US COPE seminar, held in late November in Washington, D.C., reflected this diversity. It listed editors from […]

Read More…

“Just doing my job,” by Liz Wager

Determining the appropriate authorship of publications causes all sorts of problems (in part, I believe, because none of the available guidelines apply in all situations, and many journals offer little help – but I’ve written about that elsewhere, so I’ll try not to rant about it here). What I wanted to write about was the […]

Read More…

Richard Smith: A ripping yarn of editorial misconduct

In what has been called the age of accountability, editors have continued to be as unaccountable as kings. But stories of editorial misconduct are growing, and another story, nothing less than a ripping yarn, has recently appeared in the Harvard Health Policy Review (2008; 9: 46-55.) The story is told by Donald Light and Rebecca […]

Read More…