Skip to content
The BMJ
  • Latest
  • Authors
    • Columnists
    • Guest writers
    • Editors at large
    • A to Z
  • Topics
    • NHS
    • US healthcare
    • South Asia
    • China
    • Patient perspectives
    • More …

Iain Chalmers

Paul Glasziou and Iain Chalmers: Funders and regulators are more important than journals in fixing the waste in research

September 6, 2017

Funders and regulators have the principal power to implement most of the solutions needed to reduce research waste […]

More…

Iain Chalmers, Paul Glasziou2 Comments

Paul Glasziou and Iain Chalmers: Can it really be true that 50% of research is unpublished?

June 5, 2017

Whatever the precise non-publication rate is, it is a serious waste of the roughly $180 billion annually invested in health and medical research globally […]

More…

Iain Chalmers, Paul Glasziou8 Comments

Paul Glasziou and Iain Chalmers: Ill informed replications will increase our avoidable waste of research

March 20, 2017

How does the replicability crisis relate to the estimated 85% waste in medical research? […]

More…

Iain Chalmers, Open data, Paul Glasziou1 Comment

Iain Chalmers: Should the Cochrane logo be accompanied by a health warning?

October 18, 2016

The birth of the Cochrane logo Twenty four summers ago I asked David Mostyn to design a logo to illustrate the objectives of the soon-to-be-opened Cochrane Centre. He did a […]

More…

Guest writers, Iain Chalmers0 Comments

Paul Glasziou and Iain Chalmers: Is 85% of health research really “wasted”?

January 14, 2016

Our estimate that 85% of all health research is being avoidably “wasted” [Chalmers & Glasziou, 2009] commonly elicits disbelief. Our own first reaction was similar: “that can’t be right?” Not […]

More…

Guest writers, Iain Chalmers, Paul Glasziou7 Comments

Paul Glasziou and Iain Chalmers: How systematic reviews can reduce waste in research

October 29, 2015

If you asked a member of the public “Should researchers review relevant, existing research systematically before embarking on further research?” they would probably be puzzled. Why would you ask a […]

More…

Iain Chalmers, Paul Glasziou1 Comment

Comment and opinion from The BMJ's international community of readers, authors, and editors

Access bmj.com
The BMJ logo

Most Read

  • Elizabeth Loder: Gun violence in the US—the kids…
  • Patricia Cantley: We must remember how scary…
  • Irial Eno: The case of Albert Thompson is abhorrent,…

Categories

  • Author's perspective
  • BMJ Clinical Evidence
  • Brexit
  • China
  • Christmas appeal
  • Climate change
  • Columnists
    • Billy Boland
    • Daniel Sokol
    • David Kerr
    • David Lock
    • David Oliver
    • Desmond O'Neill
    • Douglas Noble
    • Edzard Ernst
    • Gerd Gigerenzer
    • Giles Maskell
    • Iain Chalmers
    • James Raftery's NICE blogs
    • Jeff Aronson's Words
    • Jim Murray
    • Julian Sheather
    • Kieran Walsh
    • Liz Wager
    • Marge Berer
    • Martin McKee
    • Martin McShane
    • Mary E Black
    • Matt Morgan
    • Muir Gray
    • Neal Maskrey
    • Nick Hopkinson
    • Paul Glasziou
    • Penny Campling
    • Peter Brindley
    • Pritpal S Tamber
    • Rachel Clarke
    • Richard Smith
    • Sandra Lako
    • Sian Griffiths
    • Siddhartha Yadav
    • Simon Chapman
    • Tara Lamont
    • Tiago Villanueva
    • Tracey Koehlmoos
    • William Cayley
  • Editors at large
    • Anita Jain
    • Anya de Iongh
    • Birte Twisselmann
    • David Payne
    • Domhnall MacAuley
    • Fiona Godlee
    • Georg Röggla
    • Juliet Dobson
    • Robin Baddeley
    • Sally Carter
    • Tessa Richards
  • Featured
  • From the archive
  • From the other side
  • Global health
  • Guest writers
  • Junior doctors
  • Literature and medicine
  • Medical ethics
  • Metaphor watch
  • MSF
  • NHS
  • Open data
  • Partnership in practice
  • Patient perspectives
  • Readers' editor
  • Richard Lehman's weekly review of medical journals
  • South Asia
  • Students
  • The BMJ today
  • The King's fund
  • Too much medicine
  • Uncategorized
  • US healthcare

Information for Authors

BMJ Opinion provides comment and opinion written by The BMJ's international community of readers, authors, and editors.

We welcome submissions for consideration. Your article should be clear, compelling, and appeal to our international readership of doctors and other health professionals. The best pieces make a single topical point. They are well argued with new insights.

For more information on how to submit, please see our instructions for authors.

  • Contact us
  • Website terms & conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Revenue sources
  • Home
  • Top

© BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2023. All rights reserved.