Richard Smith: Does it take an earthquake to reform healthcare?

Integrating the fractured and fractious components of health and social care systems seems to be everybody’s current favoured “solution” for healthcare problems, but it’s hard to make happen. We now have evidence that it may literally take an earthquake or some other natural disaster to make it happen. Conceptually it’s easy to see why integration […]

Read More…

Richard Smith: Doctors should think less about drugs and more about food

Doctors, who prescribe drugs, are at the top of the health hierarchy, whereas nutritionists are near the bottom. At medical school students learn a huge amount about drugs, but little or nothing about food. When managing patients doctors think drugs first and any other response a long way second. We’ve had pharmacopeias for over a […]

Read More…

Richard Smith: Moving from global heath 3.0 to global health 4.0

Global health 1.0 was called tropical medicine and was primarily concerned with keeping white men alive in the tropics. Global health 2.0 was called international health and comprised clever people in rich countries doing something to help people in poor countries. It had Cold War overtones. Global health 3.0, which is still the main manifestation […]

Read More…

Richard Smith: Medical journals: “a colossal problem of quality”

We knew that we had “a colossal problem of quality” when we began the peer review congresses in 1989, said Drummond Rennie, creator of the congresses, at the seventh congress in Chicago earlier this month. That problem is now better described and defined, in large part because of the congresses, but it’s even bigger than […]

Read More…