Richard Lehman’s journal review – 27 February 2012

JAMA  22 Feb 2012  Vol 307 813    When an Italian team of physicists reported that they had detected neutrinos travelling faster than light, the televisual physicist Jim Al-Khalili promised to eat his boxer shorts if it proved to be true. It turns out to have been a measurement error due to faulty wiring. Unbelievable results […]

Read More…

Richard Lehman’s journal review – 20 February 2012

JAMA  15 Feb 2012  Vol 306 669    This week’s star Viewpoint piece is about The Unintended Consequences of Conflict of Interest Disclosure. It seems to me that twenty-first century medicine operates on roughly the same principle as the court of the Grand Vizier of the Ottoman Empire – prestige is judged by the number of […]

Read More…

Richard Lehman’s journal review – 6 February 2012

JAMA  1 Feb 2012  Vol 307 467    We of a physicianly disposition may not like to admit it, but throughout history surgeons have been well ahead of physicians at looking critically at their outcomes. For example, rates of re-operation have appeared in case series reports for well over a hundred years, so this paper on […]

Read More…

Richard Lehman’s journal review – 30 January 2012

JAMA  25 Jan 2012  Vol 307 373   Here’s the kind of study that’s all too rare in the medical literature: an important interventional trial that is not funded by pharma. The question is whether giving a proton pump inhibitor can improve outcomes in poorly controlled childhood asthma: a reasonable hypothesis to test, since a high […]

Read More…

Richard Lehman’s journal review – 23 January 2012

JAMA  18 Jan 2012  Vol 307 265     Cangrelor is one of a number of reversible thienopyridine platelet inhibitors competing to replace clopidogrel. This could be an enormous market, but the BRIDGE study, funded by The Medicines Company, begins with a small niche: patients who discontinue antiplatelet treatment before elective coronary artery bypass grafting. The problem […]

Read More…

Richard Lehman’s journal review – 16 January 2012

JAMA  11 Jan 2012  Vol 307 157    There’s a general feeling among cardiologists that low potasssium is a bad thing, but this interesting observational study of 38 689 patients with acute myocardial infarction shows that a high potassium can be even worse. On admission with AMI, potassium levels are normally distributed (figure 1): mortality in […]

Read More…