{"id":38,"date":"2008-11-27T15:07:27","date_gmt":"2008-11-27T14:07:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/?p=38"},"modified":"2008-11-27T15:07:27","modified_gmt":"2008-11-27T14:07:27","slug":"fit-notes-undecaffeinated-coffee","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2008\/11\/27\/fit-notes-undecaffeinated-coffee\/","title":{"rendered":"Fit notes?  Undecaffeinated coffee?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;m not sure whether it&#8217;s an urban legend or actual fact, but\u00a0I once heard a story about someone who was offered coffee on an aeroplane in either decaffeinated or undecaffeinated versions.\u00a0 Oh, how I laughed at the mindless pleonasm.<\/p>\n<p>I only mention it because I was awoken this morning by the sound of someone talking gibberish on the <em>Today<\/em> programme.\u00a0 (<em>Plus \u00e7a change<\/em>, and all that&#8230;)\u00a0 This particular brand of gibberish concerned those who are on long-term sick-leave, and what can be done to get them off it.\u00a0 The proposal was that sicknotes should be replaced by &#8220;fit notes&#8221; outlining what people can do, rather than outlining what they can&#8217;t.\u00a0 And, wouldn&#8217;t you know it, <a href=\"http:\/\/newsvote.bbc.co.uk\/1\/hi\/uk_politics\/7747618.stm\">the government seems to think that this is a good idea<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>It isn&#8217;t.\u00a0 It&#8217;s undecaffeinated coffee.\u00a0 There&#8217;s about a bazillion reasons why: here&#8217;s just a few.<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>We can take it as read that most people are capable of most jobs.\u00a0 This is because most jobs have to be filled by someone, and so don&#8217;t demand superhuman abilities.\u00a0 So we can assume that, absent evidence to the contrary, people are capable of pretty much every task.\u00a0 And that means that specifying the tasks that a person <em>can<\/em> do will mean writing out an indefinitely long list.\u00a0 Put another way: it&#8217;s inability that&#8217;s the exception.\u00a0 It&#8217;s a much better use of time to concentrate on the comparatively few things that a person can&#8217;t do\u00a0&#8211; which is why they&#8217;ll have sought\u00a0a doctor&#8217;s note in the first place &#8211; than on those that they can.<\/li>\n<li>On a similar note, &#8220;fit notes&#8221; assume incapacity as the default position.\u00a0 Capacity is thereby treated as noteworthy.\u00a0 That seems odd.<\/li>\n<li>It also ignores the fact that one of the factors in so many people being on the sick is that there&#8217;s been a history of shunting people there based on a system that incentivises the removal of people from unemployment benefits.\u00a0 That way, they aren&#8217;t &#8220;unemployed&#8221;, even when they patently are.\u00a0 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.badscience.net\/2008\/11\/incapacitated-on-radio-4\/\">Ben Goldacre has written on this, and made a very good radio programme about it<\/a>.\u00a0 The point, as far as I could tell, was that there&#8217;s an arm of government policy that, like it or not, promotes long-term sick leave as a way to massage the jobless figures.<\/li>\n<li>It alters the role of the GP from one of certifying that a person has a problem to herding them into work of some sort.\u00a0 I think that GPs probably have better things to do.<\/li>\n<li>And, anyway &#8211; wouldn&#8217;t it encourage people to find ways to fiddle the system if their means of honestly establishing that they can&#8217;t work were to be &#8211; at least in perception &#8211; replaced by a means of their having to defend themselves?\u00a0 What about the trust in the doctor-patient relationship?<\/li>\n<li>Look at it this way: doctors would be implicitly expected to treat patients as workshy skivers, whose abilities are kept hidden so that they can live a life of hand-outs and daytime TV.\u00a0 There&#8217;s no assumption of good faith here, and that&#8217;s corrosive of humanity as a whole\u00a0&#8211; GP or non-GP.<\/li>\n<li>et cetera.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>Naturally, none of this means that we shouldn&#8217;t be trying to get people of incapacity benefits of whatever sort.\u00a0 Of course we should &#8211; people are much happier, richer, healthier if they&#8217;re in regular work and they usually have a higher income than they would on benefits.\u00a0 As a taxpayer, I&#8217;d be happier, richer and healthier if those people were working, too.\u00a0 But, really&#8230; this kind of fluffy stuff seems to miss the point by at least th&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;is much.<\/p>\n<p>Or is it me that has missed the point?\u00a0 Regular readers might well think that that&#8217;s something I do as a matter of course.\u00a0 *sigh*<!--TrendMD v2.4.8--><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;m not sure whether it&#8217;s an urban legend or actual fact, but\u00a0I once heard a story about someone who was offered coffee on an aeroplane in either decaffeinated or undecaffeinated versions.\u00a0 Oh, how I laughed at the mindless pleonasm. I only mention it because I was awoken this morning by the sound of someone talking [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"btn btn-secondary understrap-read-more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2008\/11\/27\/fit-notes-undecaffeinated-coffee\/\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[511,475],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-38","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-in-the-news","category-politics"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}