{"id":3195,"date":"2017-07-26T19:43:32","date_gmt":"2017-07-26T18:43:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/?p=3195"},"modified":"2017-07-27T21:24:06","modified_gmt":"2017-07-27T20:24:06","slug":"can-we-trust-research-in-science-and-medicine","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2017\/07\/26\/can-we-trust-research-in-science-and-medicine\/","title":{"rendered":"Can We Trust Research in Science and Medicine?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>By\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/oxford.academia.edu\/BrianEarp\">Brian<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/oxford.academia.edu\/BrianEarp\">\u00a0D. Earp<\/a>\u00a0\u00a0(<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/briandavidearp\">@briandavidearp<\/a>)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Readers of the\u00a0<em>JME\u00a0<\/em><em>Blog<\/em> might be interested in this series of short videos in which I discuss some of the major ongoing problems with research ethics and publication integrity\u00a0in science and medicine. How much of the published literature is trustworthy? Why is peer review such a poor quality control mechanism? How can we judge whether someone is really an expert in a scientific area? What happens when empirical research\u00a0gets polarized? Most of these are short &#8211; just a few minutes. Links below:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=qvA97HzKB_k\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Why most published research probably is false<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=rb7RA4pNF7c\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">The politicization of science and the problem of expertise<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=xTotAwJH8JU\">Science&#8217;s publication bias problem &#8211; why negative results are important<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=-IUhaqGZIWs\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Getting beyond accusations of being either &#8220;pro-science&#8221; or &#8220;anti-science&#8221;<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=voS9gkpRLq4\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Are we all scientific experts now? When to be skeptical about scientific claims, and when to defer to experts<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=bs20b_79LaI\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Predatory open access publishers and why peer review is broken<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=F1akyx-3zbs\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">The future of scientific peer review<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=av6N3slCjtQ\">Sloppy science going on at the CDC and WHO<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=RIXCsUlrx5o\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Dogmas in science &#8211; how do they form?<\/a><\/p>\n<p>*\u00a0<em>Please note: this post will be cross-published with the Practical Ethics blog.\u00a0<\/em><!--TrendMD v2.4.8--><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By\u00a0Brian\u00a0D. Earp\u00a0\u00a0(@briandavidearp) Readers of the\u00a0JME\u00a0Blog might be interested in this series of short videos in which I discuss some of the major ongoing problems with research ethics and publication integrity\u00a0in science and medicine. How much of the published literature is trustworthy? Why is peer review such a poor quality control mechanism? How can we judge [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"btn btn-secondary understrap-read-more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2017\/07\/26\/can-we-trust-research-in-science-and-medicine\/\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7933,968,479,328,397,1266,1544],"tags":[8007,8011,8010,8009,8008,304,546,8006,2069,8012],"class_list":["post-3195","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-brian-earps-posts","category-clinical-ethics","category-navel-gazing","category-philosophy","category-research-ethics","category-shameless-self-publicity","category-the-nhs","tag-bias","tag-cdc","tag-expertise","tag-negative-results","tag-peer-review","tag-public-health","tag-publication-ethics","tag-replication-crisis","tag-science","tag-who"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3195","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3195"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3195\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3195"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3195"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3195"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}