{"id":180,"date":"2009-09-04T14:31:37","date_gmt":"2009-09-04T13:31:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/?p=180"},"modified":"2009-09-05T12:13:51","modified_gmt":"2009-09-05T11:13:51","slug":"aidsnazism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2009\/09\/04\/aidsnazism\/","title":{"rendered":"AIDS=Nazism?"},"content":{"rendered":"

This is a very strange story that’s been picked up by the Daily Telegraph<\/em><\/a>: a German Aids charity has been attacked for launching an advertising campaign – and a pretty sexually explicit one at that – in which people who spread HIV are presented as Hitler.\u00a0 I’m not sure whether the target is people who have unprotected sex knowing<\/em> that they’re HIV+, or just the sexually careless more generally.\u00a0 Whatever: UK Aids charities aren’t happy:<\/p>\n

“This advert has absolutely nothing to do with us or World AIDS Day campaigns in the UK, which we coordinate,” a spokeswoman for the National AIDS Trust said.<\/p>\n

“Nor does it have anything to do with World AIDS Campaign who coordinate international campaigns and this year are focusing on human rights of people living with HIV.<\/p>\n

“Of course there are many HIV organisations that run their own campaigns, however I think the advert is incredibly stigmatising to people living with HIV who already face much stigma and discrimination due to ignorance about the virus.<\/p>\n

“On top of this it fails to provide any kind of actual prevention message (e.g. use a condom) and may deter people to come forward for testing.<\/p>\n

“The advert is also inaccurate because in the UK thanks to treatment HIV is a manageable condition that does not necessary lead to AIDS.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The Telegraph<\/em> story has a link to the advert, which is also available <\/span>via YouTube<\/span><\/a> was available on YouTube before it was taken down for a terms of use violation (because it was vaguely pornographic, maybe?).<\/span> Be warned, though: it’s not safe for work<\/span> (at least, not if you share an office with people you don’t know well), and probably<\/span> almost certainly\u00a0not safe for kids<\/span> either.\u00a0 The actual campaign’s site is here<\/a>; it’s less sexually explicit (apart from the advert, of course, which you can watch there if you really want), but you might want to turn down the speakers if you’re not into vaguely industrial music.<\/p>\n

For what it’s worth, I kind of agree with the National AIDS Trust on this.\u00a0 The implication the people with HIV are genocidal madmen manqu\u00e9<\/em> doesn’t seem to be quite right.\u00a0 And, while I think that HIV\/ Aids is one of the (many) areas in relation to which the media ought to stop being so prissy and prudish, I’m not sure that this is much of an improvement.\u00a0 I don’t have any problem with people being shocked out of HIV complacency – the “Don’t Die of Ignorance” campaign<\/a> was a hell of a jolt at the time, and right on the money; and little gratuitous nudity here and there adds to the gaity of nations (anyone who denies this\u00a0being either a sexless robot or a liar).\u00a0 But somehow the two don’t sit together all that well.\u00a0 Maybe it’s just because I kind of suspect that the ad will mostly be watched by teenage boys who’ll simply not pay any attention to the at-any-rate facile slogan.\u00a0 They’ll be looking elsewhere.<\/p>\n

Ho hum.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

This is a very strange story that’s been picked up by the Daily Telegraph: a German Aids charity has been attacked for launching an advertising campaign – and a pretty sexually explicit one at that – in which people who spread HIV are presented as Hitler.\u00a0 I’m not sure whether the target is people who […]<\/p>\n

Read More…<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[963,511,577,472,407],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-180","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-curios","category-in-the-news","category-resource","category-thinking-aloud","category-wtf"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=180"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/180\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=180"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=180"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=180"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}