{"id":131,"date":"2009-06-02T12:06:27","date_gmt":"2009-06-02T11:06:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/?p=131"},"modified":"2009-06-02T12:06:27","modified_gmt":"2009-06-02T11:06:27","slug":"purdy-tries-again","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2009\/06\/02\/purdy-tries-again\/","title":{"rendered":"Purdy Tries Again&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/newsvote.bbc.co.uk\/1\/hi\/health\/8077863.stm\">Debbie Purdy goes to the House of Lords today<\/a> to seek assurance that her husband won&#8217;t be prosecuted for assisting suicide should he accompany her to the Dignitas clinic.\u00a0 It&#8217;s hard not to sympathise with her request &#8211; but, speaking on the <em>Today<\/em> programme this morning, former DPP\u00a0Sir Ken MacDonald <a href=\"http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/today\/hi\/today\/newsid_8078000\/8078531.stm\">said that he hoped her bid failed<\/a>.\u00a0 And, at least\u00a0from a legal point of view, I think he might be right.\u00a0 In essence, his point is that there&#8217;s something wrong with going to court to get permission in advance to break the law.<\/p>\n<p>He added, though\u00a0&#8211; also correctly &#8211; that there&#8217;s a very good reason to review the law.\u00a0 MacDonald came over as thoughtful and insightful &#8211; and a whole lot more impressive than George Pitcher, <a href=\"http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/today\/hi\/today\/newsid_8078000\/8078404.stm\">who had spoken on the same topic a little over an hour earlier<\/a>.\u00a0 Quite why he should have been given airtime is beyond me &#8211; his qualifications seem simply to be that (a) <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.telegraph.co.uk\/george_pitcher\">he&#8217;s religious affairs editor of the <em>Telegraph<\/em><\/a>\u00a0and (b) the BBC seems to think that you can&#8217;t have ethics without a large slice of\u00a0religion (just <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/ethics\/\">have a look at this page<\/a>\u00a0to see what I mean).\u00a0 Still &#8211; there he was.\u00a0 And, lordy, did he talk some bollocks &#8211; which is <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Bollocks#Etymology\">appropriate enough<\/a>.\u00a0 Worse, it was tired, hackneyed, and false bollocks.<\/p>\n<p>There were\u00a0several\u00a0claims:\u00a0that allowing PAS or euthanasia is socially harmful and undermines the &#8220;social fabric&#8221;\u00a0&#8211; whatever that is; that it diminishes the importance of death as a part of human life; that it undermines palliative care; that this point can be proved by looking at Holland and its non-existent palliative care system; and that allowing PAS or euthanasia for the ill will inevitably lead to its being available to the healthy.<\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s deal with the last point first.\u00a0<!--more-->\u00a0It&#8217;s false &#8211; there&#8217;s no reason to suppose that the two things&#8217;d be linked at all; and that leaves open, of course, the question of just why it&#8217;d be so wrong for a healthy person who wanted to die for some reason to be able to seek assistance.\u00a0 I simply don&#8217;t see why not [<a href=\"http:\/\/www.springerlink.com\/content\/603k005625642568\/\">insert blatant pimping of own work here<\/a>].<\/p>\n<p>Does PAS\/ euthanasia undermine palliative care?\u00a0 Again: I don&#8217;t see why it should.\u00a0 Some people will prefer not to be killed just yet; others will want to cash in their chips.\u00a0 Oh &#8211; and the claim about Dutch hospices is simply false.\u00a0 Even a quick and shoddy internet search seems to indicate that, far from there being no such thing, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.eapcnet.org\/download\/forInsight\/EJPC163_Insight.pdf\">there&#8217;s an increasing number, and that they enjoy government support<\/a>\u00a0&#8211; which could be construed by someone less charitable than I as an indication that Pitcher doesn&#8217;t much care about evidence.<\/p>\n<p>Does PAS or euthanasia devalue life or death?\u00a0 Not a bit of it.\u00a0 Pitcher himself indicates that death has to be seen as a part of life &#8211; and, this being the case, a good death would seem to be a component of a good life.\u00a0 If someone finds the prospect of pain\u00a0or\u00a0helplessness inimical to a good life, then I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;ve made a mistake.\u00a0 Of course, if a person wants to relinquish an easy exit for whatever reason, then that&#8217;s up to them.\u00a0 Still &#8211; if such an attitude is admirable, it&#8217;s still not one that merits being forced on those who don&#8217;t share it.\u00a0 That would be monstrous.\u00a0 It would undermine the dignity in dying that &#8211; notionally &#8211; we&#8217;d be seeking to preserve.\u00a0 (Because death is <em>sooooooo<\/em> dignified, isn&#8217;t it?)<\/p>\n<p>Finally, is the social fabric threatened?\u00a0 Well, I suppose that the recent Dutch civil war, famine in Brussels, the absence of any kind of education in Oregon, and so on all lend supp&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><strong>WAIT A MINUTE!<\/strong>\u00a0 Holland, Belgium and Oregon all seem still to be perfectly decent places to live.<\/p>\n<p>Pitcher nil, Thought 5.\u00a0 Away win.<!--TrendMD v2.4.8--><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Debbie Purdy goes to the House of Lords today to seek assurance that her husband won&#8217;t be prosecuted for assisting suicide should he accompany her to the Dignitas clinic.\u00a0 It&#8217;s hard not to sympathise with her request &#8211; but, speaking on the Today programme this morning, former DPP\u00a0Sir Ken MacDonald said that he hoped her [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"btn btn-secondary understrap-read-more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/2009\/06\/02\/purdy-tries-again\/\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[511,591,403,472],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-131","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-in-the-news","category-life-and-death","category-rant","category-thinking-aloud"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/131","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=131"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/131\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=131"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=131"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/medical-ethics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=131"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}