{"id":47,"date":"2010-08-26T17:21:22","date_gmt":"2010-08-26T16:21:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/injury-prevention\/?p=47"},"modified":"2010-08-26T17:21:22","modified_gmt":"2010-08-26T16:21:22","slug":"studying-firearm-regulation-and-suicide-in-quebec-joinpoint-regression","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/injury-prevention\/2010\/08\/26\/studying-firearm-regulation-and-suicide-in-quebec-joinpoint-regression\/","title":{"rendered":"Studying Firearm Regulation and Suicide in Quebec: Joinpoint Regression"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The <a href=\"http:\/\/injuryprevention.bmj.com\/content\/current\">August 2010 issue of Injury Prevention<\/a> is available now. The editor\u2019s choice for this month is \u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/injuryprevention.bmj.com\/content\/16\/4\/247.full\">Firearms regulation and declining rates of male suicide in Quebec<\/a>,\u201d by Mathieu Gange and colleagues from the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.inspq.qc.ca\/english\/default.asp\">Institut national de sant\u00e9 publique du Qu\u00e9bec<\/a>. As always, the editor\u2019s choice is freely available online.<\/p>\n<p>In their analysis, the authors use joinpoint regression techniques to analyse age-specific suicide rates over time. They were looking for evidence of an effect of Bill C-17, which increased firearms regulation, including requirements around safe storage of weapons and ammunition. Although the bill was passed in 1991, the requirements were phased in over several years and pubic awareness, uptake and compliance might also be expected to lag. Thus, it is not clear when one would expect to see a change in suicide rates potentially attributable to this regulation<\/p>\n<p>The interesting aspect of the joinpoint method, to me, is that one doesn\u2019t need to know when an effect is expected \u2013 the program fits a line or series of line segments, with inflections, or changes in slope, positioned at points which maximize the statistical fit of the line to the data. \u00a0A joinpoint is only added to the model if the change in trend at that point is statistically significant. In effect, the program finds the point at which an effect can be demonstrated.<\/p>\n<p>In this case, there was a demonstrable drop in firearm suicide rates in 1995, several years after enactment of the law. As with any ecological study, it is not possible to link the law directly to the observed reductions in firearm suicide among young men. The late 1990\u2019s saw a drop in suicide among young men in a number of Western countries. Even in Quebec, there was a joinpoint noted around the same time, associated with a fall in the rate of suicide by hanging. Broader suicide prevention initiatives, changes in the economy and increased availability of medications to treat depression may all have contributed.<\/p>\n<p>Nevertheless, the paper is consistent with others in the literature which suggest that interventions to reduce availability of lethal means \u2013 in this case, easily accessible firearms \u2013 can result in reductions in suicide. This is especially true among younger men whose suicide attempts tend to more impulsive and more lethal.<\/p>\n<p>The joinpoint methodology is worth a look if you work with injury time series. It is available online from the US National Cancer Institute here: <a href=\"http:\/\/srab.cancer.gov\/joinpoint\/\">http:\/\/srab.cancer.gov\/joinpoint\/<\/a><!--TrendMD v2.4.8--><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The August 2010 issue of Injury Prevention is available now. The editor\u2019s choice for this month is \u201cFirearms regulation and declining rates of male suicide in Quebec,\u201d by Mathieu Gange and colleagues from the Institut national de sant\u00e9 publique du Qu\u00e9bec. As always, the editor\u2019s choice is freely available online. In their analysis, the authors [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"btn btn-secondary understrap-read-more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/injury-prevention\/2010\/08\/26\/studying-firearm-regulation-and-suicide-in-quebec-joinpoint-regression\/\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[203],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-47","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-editors-choice"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/injury-prevention\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/injury-prevention\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/injury-prevention\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/injury-prevention\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/injury-prevention\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=47"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/injury-prevention\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/injury-prevention\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=47"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/injury-prevention\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=47"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/injury-prevention\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=47"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}