{"id":454,"date":"2014-11-20T16:44:52","date_gmt":"2014-11-20T16:44:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bmjebmspotlight\/?p=454"},"modified":"2017-08-21T12:06:55","modified_gmt":"2017-08-21T12:06:55","slug":"primary-care-corner-with-geoffrey-modest-md-aspirin-plus-warfarin-for-afib-and-cad","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bmjebmspotlight\/2014\/11\/20\/primary-care-corner-with-geoffrey-modest-md-aspirin-plus-warfarin-for-afib-and-cad\/","title":{"rendered":"Primary Care Corner with Geoffrey Modest MD: Aspirin plus warfarin for afib and cad???"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A remarkably\u200b common clinical situation is the patient with\u00a0coronary artery disease (CAD) who develops atrial fibrillation (afib). Do you keep the aspirin\u00a0or other antiplatelet therapy (APT)\u00a0when starting oral anticoagulants (OAC) such as warfarin??? In theory, these are 2 very\u00a0different drugs targeting 2 different ongoing mechanisms: aspirin and other APTs\u00a0inhibit\u00a0platelets and\u00a0arterial clots, acute coronary syndromes (ACS), etc; warfarin and other OACs\u00a0inhibits blood coagulation which interferes with venous clots and venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, etc.\u00a0But there is clearly a higher risk of bleeding if the combo of OAC and APT are used. The ORBIT-AF registry trial (\u00a0doi: 10.1161\/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002927), looked at 10126 patients from 176 US practices and\u00a0found that the combination of ASA and OAC was common (35% of patients), that 39% had no history of documented\u00a0atherosclerotic disease, and that there was an associated\u00a053% increased risk of major bleeding and 52% increased risk of hospitalization for major bleeding.\u00a0And (though the numbers were low) rates of ischemic events in the combo group vs the OAC group were the same:\u00a0\u00a00.48% (11 patients) in the combo group\u00a0vs 0.38% in the OAC only\u00a0group\u00a0(16 patients) after 6 months followup.<\/p>\n<p>The CORONOR study, a prospective\u00a0French observational study with a really good name,\u00a0looked at the same issue (<strong>doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jacc.2014.07.957<\/strong>)\u200b. 4184 consecutive CAD\u00a0patients who had not had a recent MI or coronary revascularization (for\u00a0at least one year)\u00a0were followed for 2 years, also finding increased bleeding with the combo therapy and no difference in cardiac outcomes.<\/p>\n<p>Details:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">&#8211;Baseline characteristics: median\u00a067 years old, 78% men,\u00a062% prior MI, 99% prior cath, 58% multi-vessel disease, 86% prior revascularization procedure,\u00a0and almost all on statin, b-blocker, ACE\/ARB, and 77% on ASA, 40% clopidogrel, 21% both, and 11% on OAC mostly for atrial\u00a0fib (65% of whom had combo OAC and antiplatelet drug, with\u00a0n=342).<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">&#8211;Patients who had major bleeding events on multivariate analysis, not surprisingly, were\u00a0on OAC (HR of\u00a04.69), had diabetes\u00a0(HR of\u00a02.76), were\u00a0older\u00a0(HR of\u00a01.04 per year), and had impaired renal function\u00a0(HR of\u00a00.98 for each ml\/min\/1.73 m<sup>2<\/sup>\u00a0decrease in eGFR).<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">&#8211;Risk of bleeding:\u00a0when\u00a0compared to antiplatelet monotherapy, the\u00a0risk for bleeding from OAC alone was nonsignificantly higher\u00a0(HR, 1.69)\u200b, but was\u00a0was much higher when OAC was combined with\u00a0APT\u00a0(HR, 7.30)<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">&#8211;Major bleeding sites: GI (55%), intracranial (20%). of the 51 patients with major bleeds (0.6%\/yr), 18 events were fatal (35.3%)<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">&#8211;T<strong>here was no difference in the combined endpoints of cardiovascular death, MI, or nonhemorrhagic stroke in those on combo therapy vs those on OAC alone<\/strong>\u00a0(HR 1.15, with CI 0.58-2.27 and p=0.697). Their figure 3 shows that the incidence of these endpoints was pretty similar in the 2 groups over a period of 800 days.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft wp-image-455 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bmjebmspotlight\/files\/2014\/11\/aspirin-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"aspirin\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" \/><\/p>\n<p>A few comments:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">&#8211;From several studies,\u00a0aspirin by itself\u00a0doesn&#8217;t work so well for atrial fibrillation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">&#8211;BUT, OACs seem pretty good for those with acute coronary syndromes or recent MIs. The\u00a0WARIS II study\u00a0of\u00a03620 patients\u00a0post-MI\u00a0found that after 4 years\u00a0the endpoint of death, nonfatal reinfarction or thromboembolic stroke <strong>was\u00a0lower<\/strong>\u00a0in those on warfarin than on aspirin alone\u00a0for secondary prevention after MI. \u00a0The SPORTIF III and IV trials\u00a0with patients with atrial fibrillation\u00a0randomized to warfarin (INR\u00a0target 2-3) vs ximelagatran, with low-dose\u00a0aspirin\u00a0allowed. Secondary analysis of the 14% of patients on aspirin (69% with CAD, 26% with previous stroke of TIA, 41% with LV dysfunction), found\u00a0no difference in the\u00a0combo\u00a0therapy in terms of stroke or systemic embolism. And the rate of MI in the combo group (0.6%\/yr) was not significantly different from warfarin alone (1.0%\/yr), but the combo group had more major bleeding (3.9%\/yr vs\u00a02.3%\/yr).<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px\">&#8211;The\u00a0European Society of Cardiology&#8217;s 2010 guidelines on atrial fibrillation\u00a0suggest OAC monotherapy in those with atrial fibrillation and stable vascular disease\u00a0(ie, &gt;1 year with no acute events)\u00a0and that antiplatelet therapy &#8220;should not be prescribed&#8221; in those without a subsequent cardiovascular event. The American College of Chest Physicians clinical practice guidelines &#8212;\u00a0see\u00a0<strong>Chest. 2012 Feb; 141 (2 Suppl):e531S-75S<\/strong>) &#8212;\u00a0similarly\u00a0recommends\u00a0that\u00a0for those with atrial\u00a0fib and high CHADS(2) score who do not have an intracoronary stent placed and are on OAC plus\u00a0APT\u00a0therapy for one year, to stop the\u00a0APT.\u200b<\/p>\n<p>So, as per usual, would be great to have a well-designed randomized controlled trial of patients with atrial fibrillation plus coronary artery disease,\u00a0comparing clinical outcomes in those assigned to the combo of OAC and antiplatelet therapy with those on OAC alone. So, what is one to do in the absence of a definitive study? given the increased likelihood of\u00a0very serious consequences of major bleeds on the combo therapy (35% mortality in these events in the current study), it seems reasonable to me that\u00a0\u00a0in those patients who have stable CAD (eg, 1 year after MI or coronary revascularization),\u00a0the safest route is to use OAC alone&#8230; and in those with atrial fibrillation and no documented CAD, not even to consider APT in addition to OAC.<\/p>\n<p>Geoff<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Aspirin plus warfarin for afib and cad??? [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"btn btn-secondary understrap-read-more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bmjebmspotlight\/2014\/11\/20\/primary-care-corner-with-geoffrey-modest-md-aspirin-plus-warfarin-for-afib-and-cad\/\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":148,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14283],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-454","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-archive"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bmjebmspotlight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/454","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bmjebmspotlight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bmjebmspotlight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bmjebmspotlight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/148"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bmjebmspotlight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=454"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bmjebmspotlight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/454\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bmjebmspotlight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=454"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bmjebmspotlight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=454"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bmjebmspotlight\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=454"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}