{"id":14917,"date":"2012-02-28T18:20:49","date_gmt":"2012-02-28T17:20:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/?p=14917"},"modified":"2012-02-29T12:27:14","modified_gmt":"2012-02-29T11:27:14","slug":"john-gabbay-%e2%80%9cwe%e2%80%99ll-never-re-elect-you-if-you-wreck-our-nhs%e2%80%9d","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2012\/02\/28\/john-gabbay-%e2%80%9cwe%e2%80%99ll-never-re-elect-you-if-you-wreck-our-nhs%e2%80%9d\/","title":{"rendered":"John Gabbay: \u201cWe\u2019ll never re-elect you if you wreck our NHS\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>So why would a retired professor of public health decide to write a protest song<\/a>, get his kids to help him record it, his wife to help him with the graphics, and take his first plunge into the dangerous world of YouTube? Isn\u2019t this the fellow that usually writes dusty academic works about evidence-based practice? The answer is that the song was indeed an attempt at evidence-based practice, just one more tool in the struggle to prevent a major threat to the people\u2019s health, namely Andrew Lansley\u2019s Health and Social Care Bill.<\/p>\n

Over two decades ago at the start of my (short) spell as regular BMJ<\/em> columnist, I argued that public health was a lot better at finding things out than at getting things done; that we needed to get smarter at the practice of making things actually happen. Today one of our chief problems is making something, Lansley\u2019s bill, not<\/em> happen.<\/p>\n

By the beginning of this year the bill\u2019s opponents had accumulated a wealth of arguments against it, but were frustrated at how little progress they were making in preventing the havoc it would wreak. The normal constitutional processes of negotiated amendments and parliamentary procedure were proving woefully impotent. It was time to go all out to stop the bill.<\/p>\n

Some of us believed therefore that we needed a large swing in public opinion. If we could foment enough of a movement to scare the politicians about their chances of re-election, we might actually get somewhere. We needed to achieve the equivalent of Thatcher\u2019s \u201cPoll tax moment\u201d (not the riots, of course, just a turning point where the government realises that the legislation is unworkable and capitulates by dropping it). That required us to tip the balance by persuading enough people to make a fuss about the threats the bill poses.<\/p>\n

The practical problem was that not only did we seem unable to get the politicians to listen; we couldn\u2019t get the message over to the general public or even (at that time) to many of our own profession.<\/p>\n

Four lots of evidence struck me as relevant to solving that political problem. (As always, I use the term \u201cevidence\u201d broadly. This was no time for a Cochrane review). The first was a renewed wealth of authoritative findings that my public health colleagues were suddenly sharing online about the potential damage\u00a0 this bill may do\u2014an invaluable source of ammunition. The second was the subjective evidence that most people’s eyes glazed over whenever I tried to explain those findings to them. It was all too complicated and too longwinded: it needed simplifying. The third was Malcolm Gladwell\u2019s influential book The Tipping Point<\/em>, in which he analyses the factors that lead to big shifts in public behaviour and concludes that it is a matter of getting a clear message that sticks in the mind, which is then spread like an epidemic, making the most of people who are well connected, respected, knowledgeable and good at selling ideas. Such people will flood the message through their natural networks until the moment comes when the balance tips and things begin changing.<\/p>\n

The fourth piece of evidence was NxtGen\u2019s brilliant Lansley Rap<\/a>, nearly a year old now, which for a while did indeed threaten to tip the balance. An internet sensation at the time, and deservedly so, it reputedly played a large part in scaring Cameron, Clegg, and Lansley into their sham of a \u201clistening pause.\u201d Dammit, if that could get half a million views and cause so much excitement even though Lansley is not\u2014whatever else he may be\u2014a \u201cgreedy tosser,\u201d then maybe we should emulate it with something up to date, aimed at an older audience not so attuned to rapping, and where you can see and hear the arguments clearly.<\/p>\n

Bringing together those four strands the answer was to try and write a good old fashioned protest song that appealed not only to the heart (the verses that paint a dystopic picture of the post-bill NHS) and the brain (the choruses that summarise the arguments) but also a threateningly obvious repeated refrain (\u201cWe\u2019ll never re-elect you if you wreck our NHS\u201d).<\/p>\n

Watch the video on YouTube <\/a>and if you like it spread the link far and wide, asking those you send it to do the same. Along with everything else we are doing, the video may help tip the balance of public opinion enough to rid us of this dreadful bill.\u00a0 It\u2019s had over 11,000 views in three weeks, but it needs a lot, lot more. You never know what a simple protest song can do till you really try.<\/p>\n

John Gabbay<\/strong> is an emeritus professor of public health<\/em>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

So why would a retired professor of public health decide to write a protest song, get his kids to help him record it, his wife to help him with the graphics, and take his first plunge into the dangerous world of YouTube? Isn\u2019t this the fellow that usually writes dusty academic works about evidence-based practice? […]<\/p>\n

Read More…<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[236],"tags":[14755],"class_list":["post-14917","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-nhs","tag-nhs"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14917","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14917"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14917\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14917"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14917"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14917"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}