{"id":14417,"date":"2012-02-01T11:54:56","date_gmt":"2012-02-01T10:54:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/?p=14417"},"modified":"2012-02-03T17:29:19","modified_gmt":"2012-02-03T16:29:19","slug":"comet-team-bravo-for-breast-reconstruction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/2012\/02\/01\/comet-team-bravo-for-breast-reconstruction\/","title":{"rendered":"COMET team: BRAVO for breast reconstruction"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>Women considering breast reconstruction after mastectomy for cancer face a myriad of choices.\u00a0 They need to decide if and when to have a reconstruction and which of the different procedures best suits their needs.\u00a0 To facilitate such complex and personal choices, women require information about previous patients\u2019 experiences of surgery, particularly about cosmesis and psychosocial outcomes.<\/p>\n

They also need information that is routinely provided about the risks of surgical complications.\u00a0 Furthermore, because breast reconstruction is optional, it is likely that patient-reported outcomes (PRO) data is of most importance to women making decisions about surgery.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n

Such high-quality data, however,\u00a0are lacking.\u00a0 Numerous papers report outcomes of reconstructive surgery, but recent reviews show massive inconsistency in outcome selection. Problems with outcome definitions and measurement methodology make data synthesis and cross study comparisons difficult (1-5).<\/p>\n

Patient-reported outcome studies have similar methodological limitations and moreover, as integration of PRO data with clinical outcome reporting is poor, oncoplastic breast and plastic surgeons are unlikely to be in a position to provide women with key information to inform choice (5).\u00a0<\/p>\n

The BRAVO (Breast Reconstruction and Valid Outcomes) study aims to address these issues and improve the value of research to patients and professionals by developing a core outcome set\u00a0that will be measured and reported, as a minimum, in all future studies of reconstructive breast surgery.\u00a0<\/p>\n

BRAVO will use recognised methodology to develop the core outcome set including the use of scientific consensus methods to prioritise a list of potential outcomes generated from extensive literature reviews. In the Delphi study, however, patients\u2019 rather than clinicians\u2019 views will be predominant, helped by a 2:1 patient:clinician voting system, to ensure that the final core outcome set contains end points that the patients themselves value, and therefore will be most useful to inform patient-centred decision-making.<\/p>\n

BRAVO is linked to the COMET<\/a> (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative, being one of the on-going studies developing core outcome sets.<\/p>\n

So BRAVO for a core outcome set for breast reconstruction and BRAVO to the first steps towards providing better information\u00a0for supporting patients and professionals making difficult decisions about reconstructive surgery in the future.<\/p>\n

References:
\n<\/strong>1.\u00a0Potter S, Brigic A, Whiting PF, Cawthorn SJ, Avery KN, Donovan JL, et al. Reporting clinical outcomes of breast reconstruction: a systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst<\/em> 2011;103(1):31-46.
\n2.\u00a0Potter S, Harcourt D, Cawthorn S, Warr R, Mills N, Havercroft D, et al. Assessment of cosmesis after breast reconstruction surgery: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol<\/em> 2011;18(3):813-23.
\n3.\u00a0Lee C, Sunu C, Pignone M. Patient-reported outcomes of breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Journal of the American College of Surgeons<\/em> 2009;209(1):123-33.
\n4.\u00a0Chen C, Cano S, Klassen A, King T, McCarthy C, Collins P. Measuring quality of life in oncologic breast surgery: A systematic review of patient reported outcome measures. The Breast<\/em> 2010;16(6):587-97.
\n5.\u00a0Winters Z, Benson J, Pusic A. A systematic review of clinical evidence to guide treatment recommendations in breast reconstruction based on patient-reported outcome measures and health-related quality of life. Annals of Surgery<\/em> 2010;252(6).<\/p>\n

Joseph Ward, Shelley Potter, Jane Blazeby and the BRAVO study steering group<\/strong><\/p>\n

Joseph Ward<\/strong> is an academic foundation doctor at the Academic Unit of Surgical Research working with Shelley Potter<\/strong>, honorary post-doctoral research fellow and Jane Blazeby<\/strong>, professor of surgery and Director of the MRC ConDuCT Hub at the University of Bristol. They are working with others on the Breast Reconstruction and Valid Outcomes (BRAVO) study to develop a core outcome set for reconstructive breast surgery. The project is registered with the COMET Initiative <\/a>and further information can be found here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Women considering breast reconstruction after mastectomy for cancer face a myriad of choices.\u00a0 They need to decide if and when to have a reconstruction and which of the different procedures best suits their needs.\u00a0 To facilitate such complex and personal choices, women require information about previous patients\u2019 experiences of surgery, particularly about cosmesis and psychosocial […]<\/p>\n

Read More…<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[223],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-14417","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-guest-bloggers"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14417","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=14417"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/14417\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=14417"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=14417"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bmj\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=14417"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}