{"id":230,"date":"2010-07-16T00:06:37","date_gmt":"2010-07-15T23:06:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bjsm\/?p=230"},"modified":"2010-07-14T20:18:33","modified_gmt":"2010-07-14T19:18:33","slug":"e-letter-performance-anomalies-in-running-shoe-design-psychological-factors","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bjsm\/2010\/07\/16\/e-letter-performance-anomalies-in-running-shoe-design-psychological-factors\/","title":{"rendered":"E-Letter: Performance anomalies in running shoe design: Psychological factors?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The following E-Letter is a response to <strong>The effect of three different levels of footwear stability on\u00a0pain outcomes in women runners: a randomised control trial<\/strong><em> <\/em>. <a href=\"http:\/\/bjsm.bmj.com:80\/cgi\/content\/abstract\/bjsm.2009.069849v1\" target=\"_blank\">Abstract<\/a> | <a href=\"http:\/\/bjsm.bmj.com\/content\/early\/2010\/06\/26\/bjsm.2009.069849.full\" target=\"_blank\">Full article<\/a><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>Ryan et al (1) provide empirical evidence that standards for running shoes in relation to foot posture are far from convincing. In particular, a sophisticated and expensive motion-control design intended for highly pronated feet was less effective than more basic shoes in minimizing injuries and pain to all categories of foot. This outcome echoes Richards et al&#8217;s (2) recent negative review regarding the role of shoe design in reducing injury.<\/p>\n<p>I wrote a rapid response (3) to the latter paper suggesting that the origin of the conundrum may not reside only in biomechanics, but rather there may be a psychological element concerning the individual&#8217;s interpretation of risk. The extreme form of this conceptualisation is &#8220;risk homeostasis&#8221;, whereby it is argued that the individual &#8220;targets&#8221; a fixed level of perceived risk to govern his\/her performance on any given activity (4,5). The psycholigical mechanisms by which risk is perceived and affects behaviour remain speculative; one model is based on low-level learning of the outcomes of competing tendencies in beviour (6). The typical activity to which the conceptualisation is applied has been road- travel and reflects the observation that may safety features do not maintain their benefit over time: drivers squander safety benefits in less careful driving, as reflected for example in greater and more erratic speeds. Two examples concern seat-belts and ABS brakes (5,6,7).<\/p>\n<p>As applied to running, the implication is that greater sophistication in shoe design reduces the perceived likelihood of potential injury; however, the consequence may be an increase in risky running behaviour. For example, the runner may pay more attention to uneven surfaces when wearing a less sophisticated design of shoe, but determine that a more sophisticated design deals adequately in equivalent circumstances; if this is not the case then more pain and injuries will result from the more sophisticated design.<\/p>\n<p><em>Tony H. Reinhardt-Rutland<br \/>\nReader in Psychology<br \/>\nUniversity of Ulster<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>References<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1. Ryan MB, Valiant GA, McDonald K, Taunton JE. The effect of three different levels of footwear stability on pain outcomes in women runners: a randomised control trial. Br J Sports Med doi:10.1136\/bjsm.2009.069849.<\/p>\n<p>2. Richards CE, Magin PJ, Callister R. Is your prescription of distance running shoes evidence-based? Br J Sports Med 2009; 43: 159-162.<\/p>\n<p>3. Reinhardt-Rutland AH. Negating the safety advantage in running shoe design: perceived risk affecting performance? Br J Sports Med 2009 [http:\/\/bjsm.com\/cgi\/eletters\/43\/3\/159]<\/p>\n<p>4. Wilde GJS, Robertson LS, Pless IB. Does risk homeostasis theory have implications for road safety? BMJ 2002; 324: 1149-1152.<\/p>\n<p>5. Adams JGU. Risk. London: UCL, 1995.<\/p>\n<p>6. Reinhardt-rutland AH. Seat-belts and behavioural adaptation: the loss of looming as a negative reinforcer. Safety Sci 2001; 39: 145-155.<\/p>\n<p>7. Aschenbrenner M, Biehl B. Improved safety through improved technical measures? Empirical studies regarding risk compensation processes in relation to anti-lock brake systems. In RM Trimpop, GJS Wilde (eds). Changes in accident prevention: The issue of risk compensation. Groningen: Styx, 1994.<!--TrendMD v2.4.8--><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The following E-Letter is a response to The effect of three different levels of footwear stability on\u00a0pain outcomes in women runners: a randomised control trial . Abstract | Full article Ryan et al (1) provide empirical evidence that standards for running shoes in relation to foot posture are far from convincing. In particular, a sophisticated [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"btn btn-secondary understrap-read-more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bjsm\/2010\/07\/16\/e-letter-performance-anomalies-in-running-shoe-design-psychological-factors\/\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1105,1],"tags":[1712,1711,1709,1399,1710,1713,1139,1714,1507],"class_list":["post-230","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-e-letters","category-uncategorized","tag-feet","tag-foot","tag-footwear","tag-injury","tag-pain","tag-posture","tag-psychology","tag-risk-homeostasis","tag-shoes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bjsm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/230","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bjsm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bjsm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bjsm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bjsm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=230"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bjsm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/230\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bjsm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=230"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bjsm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=230"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/bjsm\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=230"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}