{"id":43,"date":"2008-11-07T21:58:29","date_gmt":"2008-11-07T20:58:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc-archimedes\/?p=43"},"modified":"2008-11-07T21:58:29","modified_gmt":"2008-11-07T20:58:29","slug":"ask-and-it-might-be-given-unto-you","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/2008\/11\/07\/ask-and-it-might-be-given-unto-you\/","title":{"rendered":"Ask, and it might be given unto you."},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft\" style=\"float: left;margin-left: 3px;margin-right: 3px\" src=\"http:\/\/www.malaspina.com\/jpg\/descartes.jpg\" alt=\"Descartes - Seeker After Truth\" width=\"240\" height=\"325\" \/>The five steps of evidence based practice are commonly summarised as &#8216;Ask, Acquire, Appraise, Apply and Assess&#8217;. The first one of these &#8211; just asking a question &#8211; can prove terribly time consuming and difficult, but with a bit of dissection can be made much easier. The first step when deconstructing the anatomy of inquiry is to ask &#8216;What sort of question is being asked?&#8217;. If it&#8217;s about a clinical topic (not directions to the Pharmacy), then the questions can be grossly categorised as &#8216;foreground&#8217; and &#8216;background&#8217;. Foreground questions are specific and pointed, and can be fitted into a &#8216;PICO&#8217; frame [1]:Patient-problem, Intervention, Comparision, Outcome. An example might be &#8216;in bronchilitis [problem], is ipratropium [intervention] or salbutamol [comparison] better for improving respiratory distress? [outcome]&#8217;<!--more--> (The answer, for those who are interested, is &#8216;Neither&#8217;.) Background questions are much much broader, and often of the &#8216;what is&#8217; or &#8216;what causes&#8217; type: &#8216;what is a pilomyxoid astrocytoma?&#8217;, &#8216;what causes asthma in childhood?&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p>There are another group of questions that aren&#8217;t quite either, though. Take &#8216;when should an LP not be performed as part of a septic screen in an infant?&#8217;. It seems quite specific, at first glance, but can&#8217;t be fitted into the PICO frame &#8230; and if you dissect it further, it&#8217;s probably an amalgam of a few different questions: In a febrile infant[P] does age [I], max temperature [C], clinical assessment of &#8216;unwellness&#8217; [C], white cell count [C] or CRP [C] predict meningitis[O]? It may also have elements of clinical\/societal judgement too: &#8216;How much risk am I\/these parents\/this society prepared to take of undiagnosed meningitis?&#8217; (If it&#8217;s &#8220;zero&#8221;, then you&#8217;ll be needing to LP every child, for every febrile illness, and probably twice.)<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s this last group of questions &#8211; the &#8216;not quite in focus&#8217; that are the stumbling blocks for many in their search for evidence-based answers. If you hit one of these &#8211; your own or one of your learner&#8217;s &#8211; take a step back and rephrase, dissect and reconstruct. It may be one, two, or more individual questions. Then with a truly foreground focussed question you can move on to acquire the answer.<\/p>\n<p>[1] Bob Phillips. Practicing evidence based acute paediatrics.<\/p>\n<p>Current Pediatric Reviews, 2005, 1, 51-54<!--TrendMD v2.4.8--><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The five steps of evidence based practice are commonly summarised as &#8216;Ask, Acquire, Appraise, Apply and Assess&#8217;. The first one of these &#8211; just asking a question &#8211; can prove terribly time consuming and difficult, but with a bit of dissection can be made much easier. The first step when deconstructing the anatomy of inquiry [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"btn btn-secondary understrap-read-more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/2008\/11\/07\/ask-and-it-might-be-given-unto-you\/\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[80],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-43","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-critical-appraisal-note"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=43"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=43"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=43"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=43"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}