{"id":1228,"date":"2016-02-16T20:45:17","date_gmt":"2016-02-16T19:45:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/?p=1228"},"modified":"2016-01-27T12:31:50","modified_gmt":"2016-01-27T11:31:50","slug":"statsminiblog-value-of-information","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/2016\/02\/16\/statsminiblog-value-of-information\/","title":{"rendered":"StatsMiniBlog: Value of Information"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/files\/2015\/09\/calculator-97842_640.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-1164\" src=\"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/files\/2015\/09\/calculator-97842_640-150x150.png\" alt=\"calculator-97842_640\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" \/><\/a>When there&#8217;s a limited pot of money to do research with, it would be sensible to put it where it might do the most good, wouldn&#8217;t it?<\/p>\n<p>Well that&#8217;s exactly what the &#8216;value of information&#8217; framework attempts to help\u00a0researchers \/ commissioners of research do &#8230;<\/p>\n<p>The concept is to take what you already know, with it&#8217;s uncertainties: let&#8217;s say Zupermab vs.\u00a0rituximab for treating severe ITP has an OR of death of 0.8 (95% CI 0.55 to 1.05). The 95%\u00a0crosses 1; Zupermab might make things worse.<\/p>\n<p>How much would be sensible to invest in studies to be clearer as to if Zupermab is better than\u00a0rituximab?\u00a0<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>To do this you need to know what the benefit might be (how much is\u00a0a life saved worth?) and how much the switch to\u00a0Zupermab from\u00a0rituximab would cost (so estimates cost-effectiveness of the proposal).\u00a0You then plug in your current understanding (based on the 95% CI you have) and come up with a range of possible actual answers, given where the truth might be.<\/p>\n<p>Now propose &#8220;if we could tighten up that CI, to show that we were sure &#8211; for example &#8211; at 0.8 (95% CI 0.7 to 0.9)&#8221; &#8211; and re calculate what the cost effectiveness of switching would be. The difference between these two is the &#8216;value of perfect information&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p>Balancing this is what you estimate how much resource you&#8217;d have to put in to get there &#8211; ie &#8220;what size study would we need?&#8221;. This then generates a sample size, and\u00a0the research costs can be guessed at.<\/p>\n<p>This cost is then weighed against the benefits that would be gained if undertaken; if it&#8217;s outweighing the possible benefit it&#8217;s a no-brain rejection of the idea. If it&#8217;s not, then it&#8217;s a consideration of the risk of pouring the research money (and potential gain) against other projects (and their potential gain)&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; Archi<!--TrendMD v2.4.8--><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>When there&#8217;s a limited pot of money to do research with, it would be sensible to put it where it might do the most good, wouldn&#8217;t it? Well that&#8217;s exactly what the &#8216;value of information&#8217; framework attempts to help\u00a0researchers \/ commissioners of research do &#8230; The concept is to take what you already know, with [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"btn btn-secondary understrap-read-more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/2016\/02\/16\/statsminiblog-value-of-information\/\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2676],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1228","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-stats"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1228","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1228"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1228\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1228"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1228"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1228"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}