{"id":1214,"date":"2015-12-15T20:32:26","date_gmt":"2015-12-15T19:32:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/?p=1214"},"modified":"2015-12-16T22:33:10","modified_gmt":"2015-12-16T21:33:10","slug":"statsminiblog-rasch-analysis","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/2015\/12\/15\/statsminiblog-rasch-analysis\/","title":{"rendered":"StatsMiniBlog: Rasch Analysis"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/files\/2015\/09\/calculator-97842_640.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft wp-image-1164 \" src=\"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/files\/2015\/09\/calculator-97842_640-282x300.png\" alt=\"calculator-97842_640\" width=\"136\" height=\"145\" srcset=\"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/files\/2015\/09\/calculator-97842_640-282x300.png 282w, https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/files\/2015\/09\/calculator-97842_640.png 602w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 136px) 100vw, 136px\" \/><\/a> Yes.<\/p>\n<p>You&#8217;re right. I have spelt &#8216;rash&#8217; wrongly and yes, there are many very very bad puns which can come from this title.<\/p>\n<p>But you may have seen, occasionally, Rasch analysis as a thing on scientific paper\u00a0and wondered &#8216;Why have they spelled rash wrong?&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Rasch analysis is a way of creating a properly\u00a0scaled measurement from an interval scale (as in Likert scales).<\/p>\n<p>The scale may look like:<\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse: collapse;width: 288pt\" border=\"2\" width=\"384\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\">\n<colgroup>\n<col style=\"width: 48pt\" span=\"6\" width=\"64\" \/> <\/colgroup>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"height: 14.4pt\">\n<td style=\"height: 14.4pt;width: 48pt\" width=\"64\" height=\"19\">Happy<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 48pt\" width=\"64\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 48pt\" width=\"64\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 48pt\" width=\"64\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 48pt\" width=\"64\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 48pt\" width=\"64\">Sad<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 14.4pt\">\n<td style=\"height: 14.4pt\" align=\"center\" height=\"19\">1<\/td>\n<td align=\"center\">2<\/td>\n<td align=\"center\">3<\/td>\n<td align=\"center\">4<\/td>\n<td align=\"center\">5<\/td>\n<td align=\"center\">6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>But when people fill it in, the difference between 1 &amp; 2 is different than 3&amp;4 (that is, it&#8217;s more different to a person to be say &#8216;I&#8217;m feeling 4 not 3&#8217; &#8211; the sad side of half-way &#8211; than to say &#8216;I&#8217;m feeling 2 not 1&#8217; but still in the happy zone).<\/p>\n<p>The Rasch analysis mathematically corrects the distances between the numbers, like making the ruler rubbery.<\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse: collapse;width: 288pt\" border=\"2\" width=\"384\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\">\n<colgroup>\n<col style=\"width: 48pt\" span=\"6\" width=\"64\" \/> <\/colgroup>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"height: 14.4pt\">\n<td style=\"height: 14.4pt;width: 48pt\" width=\"64\" height=\"19\">Happy<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 48pt\" width=\"64\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 48pt\" width=\"64\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 48pt\" width=\"64\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 48pt\" width=\"64\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 48pt\" width=\"64\">Sad<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 14.4pt\">\n<td style=\"height: 14.4pt\" align=\"right\" height=\"19\">1<\/td>\n<td class=\"xl65\">2<\/td>\n<td class=\"center\">3<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">4<\/td>\n<td class=\"xl65\">5<\/td>\n<td align=\"right\">6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>&#8211; Archi<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<!--TrendMD v2.4.8--><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yes. You&#8217;re right. I have spelt &#8216;rash&#8217; wrongly and yes, there are many very very bad puns which can come from this title. But you may have seen, occasionally, Rasch analysis as a thing on scientific paper\u00a0and wondered &#8216;Why have they spelled rash wrong?&#8217; Rasch analysis is a way of creating a properly\u00a0scaled measurement from [&#8230;]<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"btn btn-secondary understrap-read-more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/2015\/12\/15\/statsminiblog-rasch-analysis\/\">Read More&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2676],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1214","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-stats"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1214","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1214"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1214\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1214"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1214"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/stg-blogs.bmj.com\/adc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1214"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}