A grain of sand.

I am a glutton for podcasts, occasionally medical, but often way off this mark (sociology, philosophy & rugby league would fall into this category), yet they frequently play into each other. Some of you will recall this, as I note that when I can’t concentrate on a podcast, I know I’m becoming overloaded/over worried and need to step […]

Read More…

Which O for PICO?

  We’ve mentioned before about the COMET initiative, that was born from lots of work in rheumatology, and seeks to standardise a core set of outcomes collected in clinical trials so that the trial Measures things of importance to patients, clinicians and researchers and Provides a degree of homogeneity that makes systematic reviews more powerful […]

Read More…

A picture paints a thousand words

  Pretty much sure that you’ve all hit something complicated and, after trying to explain it, have grabbed pencil, paper and said something like “Look, you see, it’s …”   And your picture may be completely unlike the thing you’re describing.   Well, hot on the tails of our Archi blog about the challenges with […]

Read More…

Words, listening, and the art of applying the general to the specific

A little bit of a swirl around a decade-old paper by @iona_heath on the trouble with turning a patient’s experience into something that might require medically fixing that was floated about twitter recently. The paper, which is densely written and has lots of lovely quotes from proper writers, and speak of many aspects of doctoring, holds to a […]

Read More…

StatsMiniBlog: Kappa

After a short pause while brain cells were diverted elsewhere, we’re returning with the critically acclaimed (well, slightly positively tweeted) StatsMiniBlog series. (As an aside – do let me know via comments, Facebook or Twitter if there’s an issue you’d like to see covered) Kappa (κ) is a measure of agreement, usually between two observers […]

Read More…